<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CoursePark &#187; White Papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coursepark.com/blog/category/white-papers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coursepark.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Evolution of eLearning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Even Your Grandmother Would Choose CoursePark Over the LMS &#8211; Emad Rizkalla</title>
		<link>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/even-your-grandmother-would-choose-coursepark-over-the-lms-emad-rizkalla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/even-your-grandmother-would-choose-coursepark-over-the-lms-emad-rizkalla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 11:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coursepark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLearning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://public.coursepark.com/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Admittedly, that is a pretty strong title. So, let’s start by paying a little bit of homage to the LMS. Likely, there will always be a role for the large, corporate, “big-bottomed” LMS, whose center of gravity—grounded in administrative overhead—enables large enterprises to plan and manage employee learning. If you inquire, most LMS “manufacturers” will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coursepark.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Even-your-Grandmother-would-choose-CoursePark-over-the-LMS-FINAL-Sept-2011.pdf"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1125" title="Even Your Grandmother Would Choose CousePark Over an LMS" src="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Grandmother.png" alt="Even Your Grandmother Would Choose CousePark Over an LMS" width="310" height="398" /></a>Admittedly, that is a pretty strong title. So, let’s start by paying a little bit of homage to the LMS. Likely, there will always be a role for the large, corporate, “big-bottomed” LMS, whose center of gravity—grounded in administrative overhead—enables large enterprises to plan and manage employee learning. If you inquire, most LMS “manufacturers” will gladly speak of such virtues and provide numerous features that dazzle the mind and your pocket book. It is easy to make an argument that CoursePark is the uncontested champ for today’s under-30s (and dare I say under-40s), who crave a more peer-to-peer approach to learning and who gravitate towards solutions that are more iTunes than MS DOS. However, what may surprise some is that the approach used by CoursePark to deliver personal and corporate learning has great appeal to older employees as well. It’s true that the vast majority of grandmothers surveyed in our informal poll choose CoursePark over the staid Corporate LMS.</p>
<p>LMSs have become more and more powerful (ahem … bloated), but their makers have no choice—more shock-and-awe functionality is required to play in the arena of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) that these vendors have ascribed to. Of course, it’s an accepted theorem that with more stuff comes less clarity, more effort, more administration, and increased complexity. Over our 19 years in business, we have seen that the average enterprise can take as much as two years to select, procure, customize and finally implement an LMS. By contrast, the average enterprise that chooses CoursePark is up and running and adding value within days.</p>
<p>Today’s typical LMS is reminiscent of a small ERP that clobbers the client with an array of customizable feature sets. For any organization under 2000 employees, the whole process, including the extravagant pricing and needless complexity, has been a real barrier to the very learning cultures that LMSs purport to enable. About five years ago, after finding two of our insurance clients’ critical compliance training requirements held hostage by the torturous dance of LMS courtship (for over 18 months!), Bluedrop decided enough was enough. Having built and deployed e-learning courseware for dozens of Fortune 500 clients and governments, we knew a dirty little secret unknown to most LMS shoppers. Most companies used precious little functionality from their LMS’s. Worst still, we found few end-users (i.e. employees) that actually believed the “corporate LMS” offered any tangible benefits to them personally. Most employees viewed these user-unfriendly monoliths as something they had to be forced into (at the behest of their employer). But isn’t “supporting and promoting” a culture of learning one of the promises of the LMS industry? Can we really create a learning culture without end user buy-in? It was this single realization, above all else, that gave birth to CoursePark.</p>
<p>In a marketplace that’s gone MAD, CoursePark has taken the position that for learning to occur, products need to get out of the way, and ‘coach from the side’ versus ‘pushing a rope’. The eras of ‘master-slave’ and ‘client-server’ applications have long been slain in the Internet age; so why should software—especially learning-enabling software for goodness sake—continue to propagate those tired approaches? For an LMS to help a company promote a culture of learning, less is actually more. There is no genius in that.</p>
<p><a title="CoursePark Over the LMS" href="http://www.coursepark.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Even-your-Grandmother-would-choose-CoursePark-over-the-LMS-FINAL-Sept-2011.pdf" target="_blank">Continue reading here&#8230; </a></p>
<div>
<p><em>Emad Rizkalla is CoursePark’s President.  In 1992 he co-founded Bluedrop   Performance Learning as a young engineering student and has since become   recognized as one of North America’s pioneers and thought leaders in   e-Learning, entrepreneurship and corporate leadership.  His vision,   inspirational leadership style and keen business acumen have never gone   unnoticed – Emad has been honoured as one of the youngest people ever  to  earn Canada’s “Top 40 under 40″ and is a published author and been   featured in numerous national media .  He has authored several chapters   in Aspatore Publishing’s  acclaimed “Behind the Minds” Book Series for   Executives, and has contributed regular columns on technology for the   Journal of Healthcare Management.  In 2000, he was featured in a TIME   Magazine cover story that highlighted a handful of  “young dynamic   entrepreneurs who will create the 21st Century.</em></p>
<p><em>Emad is an active member of many national committees, has chaired   several Not-for-Profit Boards and sits on a Federal task force with the   Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. He is a highly   sought speaker in conferences throughout North America and Europe. Emad   holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree from Memorial University.</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/even-your-grandmother-would-choose-coursepark-over-the-lms-emad-rizkalla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jay Cross &#8211; Whose learning are you responsible for?</title>
		<link>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/jay-cross-whose-learning-are-you-responsible-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/jay-cross-whose-learning-are-you-responsible-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 11:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coursepark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLearning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://public.coursepark.com/?p=1066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I conducted several workshops to inject informal and social learning practices into hidebound organizations that were anxious to ramp up to the future. I encouraged them to address the needs of people who had traditionally been left out of the corporate training agenda. In the old days, corporate training departments focused solely on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Last month I conducted several workshops</strong> to inject informal and social learning practices into hidebound  organizations that were anxious to ramp up to the future. I encouraged  them to address the needs of people who had traditionally been left out  of the corporate training agenda.</p>
<p>In the old days, corporate training departments focused solely on  workers on the payroll. Most of the effort went into getting novices up  to speed and grooming fast-trackers as future leaders. Training  departments largely overlooked improving the skills of seasoned  employees, despite the fact that these were the people whose efforts  were paying the bills.</p>
<p>This myopia is the result of looking at training as a cure for  cluelessness rather than the route to ever-greater levels of  performance. The logic went, “If it’s broken, fix it,” but don’t waste  time converting adequate performers into stars. The world’s become too  competitive to let this neglect continue.</p>
<p><strong><span id="more-1066"></span>Any organization that is  committed to working smarter needs to assess the impact of helping  employees learn at every step in their career cycle. </strong>What’s it  worth, for example, to offer learning opportunities to potential  recruits before they come on board? These “pre-hires” can become  familiar with the company before signing on. This cuts costly hiring  mistakes that hurt both the organization and the new hire.</p>
<p><a href="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Employees.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1143" title="Employees" src="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Employees.png" alt="Employees" width="332" height="272" /></a></p>
<p>Seasoned employees are not going to  flock to classes and workshops; they have work to do. But making it  easier through collaboration, self-service learning and skill bites  helps sharp people become sharper. Making a producer just a little bit  more productive yields greater rewards than anything you can do with  novices.</p>
<p>Old hands may have known it all in yesterday’s world, but they can  only remain productive by keeping up with changes. Furthermore, a  company that doesn’t tap its community elders as coaches, mentors and  guides is missing an important trick. IBM and other corporations  generate leads and harvest insider knowledge by keeping former employees  in the community — and, therefore, in the loop.</p>
<p>Increasingly, organizations are sustained by people who are not on  the payroll. These are contract workers and individuals called in for a  particular project. They are temps, specialists, consultants and service  providers. Perhaps they work for an outsource provider.</p>
<p>However, these workers are not exempt from needing to know what’s  going on and continuously getting better at what they do. It’s the logic  of the supply chain: Since inefficient links get passed along to the  customer, companies must optimize the performance of the chain. That  means improving the brainpower of everyone who works for the company —  not just those who receive paychecks.<a href="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/cluetrain.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1141" title="cluetrain" src="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/cluetrain.jpg" alt="cluetrain" width="75" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cluetrain-Manifesto-End-Business-Usual/dp/0738204315/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1255390355&amp;sr=8-2">The Cluetrain Manifesto</a></strong>,  a set of 95 principles for businesses operating in the newly connected  workplace, just turned 10 years old. Here’s the clue: Markets are  conversations. Doc Searls, co-author of the manifesto, amended that to  “markets are relationships.” Exactly. Companies can’t exist in  isolation. Value has moved from the nodes to the connections. No  business can survive without good ties to a healthy ecosystem.</p>
<p>And that applies to customer relationships as well. Take me, for  example. I recently purchased a snazzy video camera. The manual appears  to have been written for rocket scientists. The companion Web site is  simply a PDF of the manual. Ugh.<br />
<a href="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Business-Eco-System.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1142" title="Business Eco System" src="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Business-Eco-System.png" alt="Business Eco System" width="332" height="272" /></a> <strong>Developing an amazing piece of machinery</strong> like this  camera must cost millions. For just $100,000 more, the company could  have set up a discussion site for customers to swap information, opened a  customer hot line, hired an English grad student to write a coherent  self-study manual, gotten feedback for new product development and  provided a list of links to useful sites for new HD video camera owners.  And to attract prospective buyers, they could have opened up lessons  for all would-be videographers.</p>
<p>If I were greeted with useful resources such as those, I would be  much more likely to buy from the same supplier again. As it is now, I  have learned nothing from the camera makers, they have learned nothing  from me, and we have no relationship at all.<br />
<strong><br />
Shouldn’t chief learning officers shoulder the responsibility for learning by everyone in the extended enterprise?</strong></p>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
<p><em><a title="Jay Cross" href="http://www.internettime.com/professional-speaker/" target="_blank"><strong>Jay Cross</strong></a> is the Johnny Appleseed of informal learning.  <a title="Internet Time Alliance" href="http://internettimealliance.com/" target="_blank">The Internet Time  Alliance</a>, which he chairs, helps corporations and governments use networks to accelerate performance.</em></p>
<p><em>Jay has challenged conventional wisdom about how adults learn  since designing the first business degree program offered by the  University of Phoenix. A champion of informal learning and systems  thinking, Jay&#8217;s calling is to help people improve their performance on  the job and satisfaction in life. He was the first person to use the  term eLearning on the web. He literally wrote the book on Informal  Learning. He is also co-author of </em><em>Implementing eLearning and </em><em>The </em><em>Working Smarter Fieldbook.  His philosophies on the power of informal learning and net-work have  fundamentally changed the world of learning in organizations.</em></p>
<p><em>He is a graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Business   School. Jay and his wife Uta live with their miniature longhaired   dachshund in the hills of Berkeley, California.</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/jay-cross-whose-learning-are-you-responsible-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jay Cross &#8211; Informal Learning</title>
		<link>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/informal-learning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/informal-learning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 11:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coursepark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eLearning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://public.coursepark.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Informal Learning in a Nutshell WORKERS LEARN MORE in the coffee room than in the classroom. They discover how to do their jobs through informal learning: talking, observing others, trial-and-error, and simply working with people in the know. Formal learning—classes and workshops—is the source of only 10 to 20 percent of what people learn at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 100%;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 100%;"><script src="http://zoom.it/bHpy.js?width=auto&amp;height=400px"></script> </span></div>
<p><script src="http://zoom.it/enK8.js?width=auto&amp;height=400px"></script><span style="font-size: 115%;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<h2>Informal Learning in a Nutshell</h2>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CorporateLearning.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1061" title="CorporateLearning" src="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CorporateLearning.png" alt="Corporate Learning" width="310" height="200" /></a>WORKERS LEARN MORE</strong> in  the coffee room than in the classroom. They discover how to do their  jobs through informal learning: talking, observing others,  trial-and-error, and simply working with people in the know. Formal  learning—classes and workshops—is the source of only 10 to 20 percent of  what people learn at work. Corporations overinvest in formal training  programs while neglecting natural, simpler informal processes.<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>OUT OF TIME</strong></p>
<p>More  happens in a minute today than in one of your great grandmother’s  minutes. Not only is more and more activity packed into every minute,  the rate of change itself is increasing. Measured by the atomic clock,  the twenty-first century will contain a hundred years. Measured by how  much will happen in the twenty-first century, we will experience twenty  thousand current years (Kurzweil, <em>The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology.</em>). Change  itself is accelerating. People are anxious. The future is  unpredictable. Companies are run by sound bites. People plan; God  laughs. The traditional mode of training employees is obsolete.</p>
<p><strong>INFORMAL LEARNING</strong></p>
<p>Learning  is that which enables you to participate successfully in life, at work,  and in the groups that matter to you. Informal learning is the  unofficial, unscheduled, impromptu way people learn to do their jobs.  Formal learning is like riding a bus: the driver decides where the bus  is going; the passengers are along for the ride. Informal learning is  like riding a bike: the rider chooses the destination, the speed, and  the route. The rider can take a detour at a moment’s notice to admire  the scenery or go to the bathroom. Learning is adaptation. Taking  advantage of the double meaning of the word <em>network,</em> to learn is to optimize the quality of one’s networks.<span id="more-1021"></span></p>
<p><strong>SHOW ME THE MONEY</strong></p>
<p>Executives  don’t want learning; they want execution. They want the job done. They  want performance. Informal learning is a profit strategy. Companies are  applying it to:</p>
<p>• Increase sales by making product knowledge instantly searchable</p>
<p>• Improve knowledge worker productivity</p>
<p>• Transform an organization from near-bankruptcy to record profits</p>
<p>• Generate fresh ideas and increase innovation</p>
<p>• Reduce stress, absenteeism, and health care costs</p>
<p>• Invest development resources where they will have the most impact</p>
<p>• Increase professionalism and professional growth</p>
<p>• Cut costs and improve responsiveness with self-service learning</p>
<p>Knowledge  workers demand respect and expect to be treated fairly. They thrive  when given the freedom to decide how they will do what they’re asked to  do. They rise or fall to meet expectations.</p>
<p>Training  managers have complained for years that senior managers don’t  understand the value of training. Lots of formal learning programs do  not work. Maybe the executives <em>do</em> understand the value of formal training. They’ve determined that in its present form, it’s not worth much.</p>
<p>Tragically,  many firms have mistaken measuring activity for measuring results.  Training directors measure participant satisfaction, the ability to pass  tests, and demonstrations. They don’t measure business results because  they don’t own the yardstick by which business results are measured.</p>
<p><strong>EMERGENCE</strong></p>
<p>Training  is something that’s pushed on you; someone else is in charge. Learning  is something you choose to do, whether you’re being trained or not.  You’re in charge. Many knowledge workers will tell you, “I love to learn  but I hate to be trained.”</p>
<p>Formal  learning takes place in classrooms; informal learning happens in  learnscapes, that is, a learning ecology. It’s learning without borders.</p>
<p>Critics  say that it’s impossible to formalize informal learning and therefore  informal learning is unmanageable. In fact, I don’t want an executive  managing learning; that’s the worker’s responsibility. What I want to do  is optimize learning outcomes. Optimization means removing obstacles,  seeding communities, increasing bandwidth, encouraging conversation, and  so forth.</p>
<p><strong>CONNECTING</strong></p>
<p>Reinventing  the wheel, looking for information in the wrong places, and answering  questions from peers consume two-thirds of the average knowledge  worker’s day. Slashing this waste provides a lot more time to devote to  improving the business, reducing payroll, or, more likely, a bit of  both.</p>
<p>Knowledge  management is no longer the intellectual high ground it once was, by  and large because it didn’t work. Knowledge lives in people’s heads, not  in mere words. You can no more capture true knowledge in a repository  than you can trap lightning in a box.</p>
<p>The  informal organization is how most business gets done, yet executives  miss it because they can’t see it. Mapping social networks make the  pattern clear.</p>
<p>It’s not who you know that’s important; it’s who those others know.</p>
<p><strong>META-LEARNING</strong></p>
<p>Learning  is a skill, like playing golf. The more you practice, the better your  performance is, but if golfers followed the pattern of businesspeople  learning, they would arrive for a match without ever having thought  about the game or touched a club.</p>
<p>Many  traditional training departments concentrate almost all of their energy  on providing training to novices. That’s like providing kindergarten  classes to high school students to save money. In truth, the more mature  learners, typically the top performers, are simply going to skip it  entirely or become disgruntled.</p>
<p>Intuition  is often more effective than logic because it calls on whole-body  intelligence. It is born of relationships and patterns. It draws on the  power of the unconscious mind to sort through meaningful experience as  well as the immediate situation.</p>
<p><strong>LEARNERS</strong></p>
<p>If  something improves the overall value of the ecosystem and the welfare  of the individual worker, I’m in favor of it. This includes helping  workers build personal strengths and overcome personal obstacles.</p>
<p>If your basic mental systems are out of whack, you may be working extra hard just to cope.</p>
<p>It  should come as no surprise that workers don’t like training. Most  training is built atop the pessimistic assumption that trainees are  deficient, and training is the cure for what’s broken. Everybody wins if  the starting point is, “Be all that you can be.”</p>
<p>You  may have the best thoughts in the world, but if you don’t communicate  them effectively, they won’t help you or anyone else. I’m thinking about  how you converse, tell stories, speak in public, and write.</p>
<p>If you’re not happy, you should do something about it.</p>
<p><strong>ENVISIONING</strong></p>
<p>We  humans are sight mammals. We learn almost twice as well from images and  words as from words alone. Visual language engages both hemispheres of  the brain. Pictures translate across cultures, education levels, and age  groups. Yet the majority of the content of corporate learning is text.  Schools spend years on verbal literacy but only hours on visual  literacy. It’s high time for us to open our eyes to the possibilities.</p>
<p>Graphics  are not fluff. Consider how they can improve informal learning  throughout your organization. Graphics work wonders when you need to:</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>• Bring deeper understanding to complex subject matter.</p>
<p>• Share results of dynamic meetings with others.</p>
<p>• Help the team see the big picture and focus attention.</p>
<p>• Improve the decision-making process.</p>
<p><strong>CONVERSATION</strong></p>
<p>Conversations  both create and transmit knowledge. Frequent and open conversation  increases innovation and learning. Schooling planted a false notion in  our heads that real learning is something you do on your own. In fact,  we learn things from other people. People love to talk. Bringing them  together brings excitement.</p>
<p>People  spend most of their time at work or at home. Work is a demanding,  pressure-packed, rats-in-the-maze race with the clock to get the job  done. Home is a comfortable, private space for sharing time with family  and individual interests. Neither work nor home, a World Café is a  neutral spot where people come together to offer hospitality, enjoy  comradeship, welcome diverse perspectives, and have meaningful  conversations.</p>
<p>Business  conversations at Pfizer no longer consist of knee-jerk emotional  responses, because people have a means of critiquing the quality of  their conversations. They ask, “Is the information valid? Are we making  an informed choice? Are we exercising mutual control over the  conversation?”</p>
<p><strong>COMMUNITIES</strong></p>
<p>Unless you are a hermit, you are a member of several communities of practice, although you may not have thought of it that way.</p>
<p>For  a long time, I maintained that communities were organic. Like truffles,  they sort of sprouted up on their own, where they wanted, and the most  you could do was to nurture them by providing time and space for them to  meet. Times have changed. A quarter of the world’s truffles are  cultivated on a plantation in Spain.</p>
<p>As  fast and easy as it is to search Google, Cisco sales engineers can  pinpoint just the knowledge they’re looking for. They query the in-house  repository of VoDs, and the system takes them down to the exact  sentences or slides of interest.</p>
<p>LEGO  hobbyists are a community of practice. Subgroups create building  standards that enable them to create large displays quickly.</p>
<p><strong>UNBLENDED</strong></p>
<p>It has become trite to point out that the <em>e</em> of eLearning doesn’t matter and that it’s the learning that counts. I  don’t think the learning counts for much either. What’s important is the  doing that results from learning. Executives don’t care about learning;  they care about execution.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>In  2001, training directors turned their attention to return on  investment. Unfortunately, instead of learning cost-benefit analysis,  people who wanted to speak the language of business studied accounting.  Created long before knowledge work was invented, accounting values  intangibles such as human capital at zero and counts training as an  expense instead of an investment.</p>
<p>Consider  how we managed to end up with a VCR in every classroom. Was it because  teachers wanted to show nature documentaries? Hardly. Massive demand by  America’s seemingly endless thirst for pornography drove the unit price  to $100. Smart phones, voice recognition, and virtual reality are  learning tools, but learning won’t drive their development. Courses are  dead.</p>
<p><strong>THE WEB</strong></p>
<p>The  Internet changed everything. In 1996, there were 16 million Internet  users; in 2006 they number more than 1 billion. Google is the largest  learning provider, answering thousands of inquiries every second.</p>
<p>Recently, I hosted a series of unworkshops on learning with blogs, wikis, and Web 2.0 tools. Why the <em>un</em>? To crush the old paradigm of workshop leader spoon-feeding participants.</p>
<p>Imagine  having an in-house learning and information environment as rich as the  Internet. You’d have blogs, search, syndication, podcasts, mash-ups, and  more. You’d also have a platform just about everyone already knows how  to use. CGI, a large Canadian services company is doing precisely that.</p>
<p><strong>GROKKING</strong></p>
<p>To <em>grok</em> is to understand profoundly through intuition or empathy. Learning  without training is alive and well. BP employees in vital positions grok  their roles in an extremely complex organization digesting several  mega-mergers.</p>
<p><strong>UNCONFERENCES</strong></p>
<p>Business  meetings used to come in one flavor: dull. New approaches are creating  meetings that people enjoy, often organized in scant time, and at  minimal cost. These meetings are not events; there’s typically activity  before and after. If something is working well, why not share it with  everyone? And why not keep it alive as long as you can? Successful  gatherings are those where everyone participates.</p>
<p>There  were no presentations at BAR Camp, no PowerPoints, no better-than-thou,  no podium, and no positions carved in stone. Instead of presentations,  campers had conversations. We were equals, co-discovering new ways to  look at things. We sat in circles. No one was in charge because we were  all in charge.</p>
<p><strong>JUST DO IT</strong></p>
<p>Management  must assign enterprise-level accountability for learning. Unless you  are blessed with a rare, sensitive executive management team, you must  address governance or scrap plans of getting the benefits you’ve been  reading about.</p>
<p>Natural  learning requires an attitude of surrender and acceptance. Informal  learning is unbounded. It enables us to find a voice to take its place  alongside other parts of who we are as humans. We need all of who we are  to be fully engaged, outside and with inner realms to meld with larger  wisdom in the world.</p>
<p>As work and learning become one, good learning and good work become synonymous.</p>
<p>Don’t  start with problems. Beginning with problems starts you off on the  wrong path. You may solve the problem but miss a fantastic opportunity  that was yours for the taking</p>
<p><a title="View PREFACE to Informal Learning on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/2250496/PREFACE-to-Informal-Learning">PREFACE to Informal Learning</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0787981699?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=internettim00-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0787981699"></a><a href="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/inf_cover-1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1062" title="inf_cover-1" src="http://public.coursepark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/inf_cover-1.jpg" alt="Informal Learning Cover" width="206" height="268" /></a>Informal Learning: Rediscovering the Natural Pathways That Inspire Innovation and Performance</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Informal-Learning-Rediscovering-Performance-ebook/dp/B001J6OR26/ref=kinw_dp_ke?ie=UTF8&amp;m=AG56TWVU5XWC2">Kindle edition</a></p>
<p><a href="http://jaycross.com/">Jay Cross</a></p>
<p>ISBN: 0-7879-8169-9, 320 pages.</p>
<p>Thirty <a href="http://internettime.pbwiki.com/testimonials">readers tell you</a> why you should buy this book.</p>
<p><em><a title="Jay Cross" href="http://www.internettime.com/professional-speaker/" target="_blank"><strong>Jay Cross</strong></a> is the Johnny Appleseed of informal learning.  <a title="Internet Time Alliance" href="http://internettimealliance.com/" target="_blank">The Internet Time  Alliance</a>, which he chairs, helps corporations and governments use   networks to accelerate performance.</em></p>
<p><em>Jay has challenged conventional wisdom about how adults learn   since designing the first business degree program offered by the   University of Phoenix. A champion of informal learning and systems   thinking, Jay’s calling is to help people improve their performance on   the job and satisfaction in life. He was the first person to use the   term eLearning on the web. He literally wrote the book on Informal   Learning. He is also co-author of </em><em>Implementing eLearning and </em><em>The </em><em>Working  Smarter Fieldbook.  His philosophies on the power of informal learning  and net-work have  fundamentally changed the world of learning in  organizations.</em></p>
<p><em>He is a graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Business    School. Jay and his wife Uta live with their miniature longhaired    dachshund in the hills of Berkeley, California.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coursepark.com/blog/2011/05/informal-learning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
